Welcome! Take a virtual stroll through our factory – no shoes required! Let's go

Blog

3003 vs. 3004 Aluminum Alloy

Introduction: Understanding the Key Choice in Aluminum-Manganese Alloys

When selecting aluminum fabrication materials, purchasers often find themselves in a dilemma between 3003 and 3004 aluminum alloys. Although these two 3000-series aluminum-manganese alloys have similar chemical compositions, their performance differences dictate their distinct application areas.

3003 vs 3004 aluminum

Here's the Core Difference:

  • 3004 Aluminum Alloy is engineered for strength-priority applications—ideal for beverage can bodies, architectural roofing, pressure vessels, and automotive components.
  • 3003 Aluminum Alloy is optimized for formability and versatility—perfect for kitchen equipment, heat exchangers, chemical storage tanks, and decorative sheets.

The Chemical Composition Reveals the Key: 3004 aluminum alloy has an addition of 0.8-1.3% magnesium, which increases its strength by 40-55% but reduces its elongation by 60-75%. In the H14 temper, 3003 has an elongation of 8.3%, while 3004 has only 2.8%—this difference solidifies 3003's advantage in applications requiring complex forming.

Quick Comparison at a Glance:

Property 3003 3004 Advantage
Tensile Strength (H14) 160 MPa 240 MPa 3004 (+50%)
Yield Strength (H14) 130 MPa 200 MPa 3004 (+54%)
Elongation (H14) 8.3% 2.8% 3003 (+196%)
Brinell Hardness (H14) 42 HB 67 HB 3004 (+60%)
Thermal Conductivity 180 W/m-K 160 W/m-K 3003 (+12%)
Weld Joint Efficiency ~85% ~94% 3004
Formability Excellent Good 3003
Relative Cost Baseline +5-10% 3003

3003 and 3004 quick comparison

Chemical Composition: The Critical Role of Magnesium

The performance gap between these two alloys stems directly from differences in their chemical composition:

Element 3003 3004 Impact
Magnesium (Mg) 0% 0.8-1.3% Higher Mg = Significantly higher strength + Enhanced corrosion resistance
Manganese (Mn) 1.0-1.5% 1.0-1.5% Mn improves corrosion resistance and strengthening response
Copper (Cu) 0.05-0.2% ≤0.25% Cu enhances strength
Silicon (Si) ≤0.6% ≤0.3% Controls casting properties
Iron (Fe) ≤0.7% ≤0.7% Impurity element
Zinc (Zn) ≤0.1% ≤0.25% Trace element
Aluminum (Al) 96.8-99% 95.6-98.2% Base metal

3003 and 3004 Chemical Composition

Technical Explanation: The approximately 1% magnesium content in 3004 works via a solid solution strengthening mechanism. When magnesium atoms dissolve into the aluminum matrix, they create lattice distortion, which impedes dislocation movement, thereby increasing the material's yield and tensile strength. This is precisely why 3004 was developed for the beverage can industry—higher strength allows for the use of thinner material (down-gauging by ~20%), saving material while maintaining structural integrity.

Mechanical Properties: The Strength vs. Ductility Trade-off

O Temper (Annealed - Softest State)

Property 3003-O 3004-O Difference
Ultimate Tensile Strength 110 MPa 170 MPa 3004 is 55% stronger
Yield Strength 40 MPa 69 MPa 3004 is 73% higher
Elongation 28% 19% 3003 has 47% higher ductility
Brinell Hardness 28 HB 45 HB 3004 is harder
Shear Strength 75 MPa 110 MPa 3004 is 47% higher

H14 Temper (Half-Hard - Most Common)

Property 3003-H14 3004-H14 Difference
Ultimate Tensile Strength 160 MPa 240 MPa 3004 is 50% stronger
Yield Strength 130 MPa 200 MPa 3004 is 54% higher
Elongation 8.3% 2.8% 3003 has 196% higher ductility
Brinell Hardness 42 HB 67 HB 3004 is 60% harder
Fatigue Strength 60 MPa 97 MPa 3004 is 62% higher

H18 Temper (Full-Hard)

Property 3003-H18 3004-H18 Difference
Ultimate Tensile Strength 210 MPa 300 MPa 3004 is 43% stronger
Yield Strength 180 MPa 250 MPa 3004 is 39% higher
Elongation 4.5% 1.1% 3003 has 309% higher ductility
Brinell Hardness 56 HB 80 HB 3004 is 43% harder

Key Observation: 3004 exhibits significantly higher strength in all tempers, but at the cost of drastically reduced ductility. For parts that require deep drawing, tight bends, or spinning, the superior ductility of 3003 makes it the unequivocal choice. For structural components or applications that need to bear loads in thin gauges, the strength advantage of 3004 is irreplaceable.

Physical Properties Comparison

Property 3003 3004
Density 2.73 g/cm³ 2.72 g/cm³
Melting Range 640-650°C 630-650°C
Thermal Conductivity 180 W/m·K 160 W/m·K
Electrical Conductivity 44% IACS 42% IACS
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion 23 µm/m·K 24 µm/m·K
Modulus of Elasticity 70 GPa 70 GPa

3003 vs 3004 Physical Properties Comparison

Practical Implications: The densities of both alloys are nearly identical, offering comparable weight-saving benefits. However, 3003's thermal conductivity is 12% higher than 3004's, making it better suited for applications like heat exchangers, heat sinks, and cookware.

Corrosion Resistance: A Slight Edge for 3004

Both alloys form a protective oxide film, but the magnesium content in 3004 makes it more resistant to corrosion in certain harsh environments:

Environment 3003 3004 Advantage
Atmospheric Exposure Excellent Excellent Comparable
Freshwater Excellent Excellent Comparable
Seawater Immersion Very Good Excellent (≤0.03 mm/year) 3004
Industrial Chemicals Good Very Good 3004
Alkaline Solutions Moderate Moderate Comparable
Chloride Environments Very Good Excellent 3004

Why This Matters: For coastal architecture, marine components, and offshore platforms, the difference between "Very Good" and "Excellent" can mean decades of additional service life. 3004 has been specified by classification societies like Lloyd's Register and DNV for critical marine structures.

Weldability: Both are Excellent, 3004 Slightly Better

Welding Method 3003 3004
TIG (GTAW) Very Good Excellent
MIG (GMAW) Very Good Excellent
Resistance Welding Very Good Excellent
Friction Stir Welding Good Excellent (≥95% joint efficiency)
Recommended Filler Wires 5356, 5556 5356, 5556, 5754
Hot Cracking Sensitivity Low Very Low
Post-Weld Strength Retention ~85% ~94%

Engineering Tip: Neither alloy requires preheating or post-weld heat treatment. For 3004, using a matching 5754 filler wire in critical applications like pressure vessels and nuclear facilities can maximize the corrosion resistance continuity in the welded zone.

Formability: The Competitive Advantage of 3003

Operation 3003 3004
Deep Drawing Excellent Good
Stretch Forming Excellent Good
Bending (Min. Radius) 0-1t 1-2t
Spinning Excellent Moderate
Stamping Complex Shapes Superior Acceptable
Work Hardening Rate Lower Higher
Springback Less More

Practical Example: When forming automotive interior panels or appliance panels with complex curves, 3003-O aluminum allows for tighter bend radii without fracturing. 3004 aluminum requires more sophisticated tooling design, and complex parts often need an intermediate annealing step.

Application

Industry Best Uses for 3003 Best Uses for 3004
Packaging Food containers, aluminum foil Beverage can bodies, bottle caps
Architecture Ceilings, decorative panels, gutters Roofing panels, wall panels, curtain walls
Automotive Radiators, interior trim Fuel tanks, body panels, heat exchangers
Chemical General storage tanks, piping Pressure vessels, corrosive media tanks
HVAC Heat exchangers, evaporators Structural supports
Consumer Goods Cookware, appliance casings Industrial containers
Electrical Cable conduits, enclosures LED lamp heads, high-strength housings
Transportation Trailer interiors, trim Refrigerated truck bodies, fuel tankers

Cost Considerations

Factor 3003 3004
Base Material Cost Baseline +5-10%
Global Availability Widely stocked Common, slightly longer lead times in NA
Scrap Value Standard aluminum scrap rate Same
Lifecycle Cost (Marine Env.) Higher (more maintenance) Lower (longer service life)

Procurement Insight: 3003 is a "workhorse alloy" stocked by nearly all aluminum distributors. While 3004 is increasingly popular, it may require longer lead times in North America. Since 2014, the adoption rate of 3004 in automotive OEMs has grown rapidly with the push for vehicle light-weighting initiatives.

Detailed Temper Performance Comparison

H1x Series (Strain-Hardened Only)

H12 (1/4 Hard)

Property 3003-H12 3004-H12 Difference
Tensile Strength 130 MPa 160 MPa 3004 +23%
Yield Strength 100 MPa 140 MPa 3004 +40%
Elongation 11% 2.3% 3003 +378%
Hardness 36 HB 46 HB 3004 is harder

H16 (3/4 Hard)

Property 3003-H16 3004-H16 Difference
Tensile Strength 180 MPa 260 MPa 3004 +44%
Yield Strength 170 MPa 220 MPa 3004 +29%
Elongation 5.2% 2.8% 3003 +86%
Hardness 49 HB 73 HB 3004 is harder

H2x Series (Strain-Hardened and Partially Annealed)

H22 (1/4 Hard)

Property 3003-H22 3004-H22 Difference
Tensile Strength 140 MPa 210 MPa 3004 +50%
Yield Strength 94 MPa 160 MPa 3004 +70%
Elongation 7.7% 4.3% 3003 +79%
Hardness 37 HB 58 HB 3004 is harder

H24 (1/2 Hard)

Property 3003-H24 3004-H24 Difference
Tensile Strength 160 MPa 240 MPa 3004 +50%
Yield Strength 130 MPa 190 MPa 3004 +46%
Elongation 6.0% 3.4% 3003 +76%
Hardness 45 HB 66 HB 3004 is harder

H26 (3/4 Hard)

Property 3003-H26 3004-H26 Difference
Tensile Strength 180 MPa 260 MPa 3004 +44%
Yield Strength 160 MPa 220 MPa 3004 +38%
Elongation 3.1% 3.4% Similar
Hardness 53 HB 72 HB 3004 is harder

H28 (Full Hard)

Property 3003-H28 3004-H28 Difference
Tensile Strength 210 MPa 300 MPa 3004 +43%
Yield Strength 180 MPa 240 MPa 3004 +33%
Elongation 1.7% 1.4% Similar
Hardness 59 HB 79 HB 3004 is harder

H3x Series (Strain-Hardened and Stabilized)

H32 (1/4 Hard)

Property 3003-H32 3004-H32 Difference
Tensile Strength 145 MPa 210 MPa 3004 +45%
Yield Strength 110 MPa 170 MPa 3004 +55%
Elongation 7.8% 7.4% Similar
Hardness 39 HB 54 HB 3004 is harder

H34 (1/2 Hard)

Property 3003-H34 3004-H34 Difference
Tensile Strength 165 MPa 240 MPa 3004 +45%
Yield Strength 135 MPa 200 MPa 3004 +48%
Elongation 6.4% 5.8% Similar
Hardness 46 HB 64 HB 3004 is harder

H36 (3/4 Hard)

Property 3003-H36 3004-H36 Difference
Tensile Strength 185 MPa 260 MPa 3004 +41%
Yield Strength 155 MPa 220 MPa 3004 +42%
Elongation 4.2% 4.8% Similar
Hardness 51 HB 71 HB 3004 is harder

H38 (Full Hard)

Property 3003-H38 3004-H38 Difference
Tensile Strength 205 MPa 290 MPa 3004 +41%
Yield Strength 175 MPa 250 MPa 3004 +43%
Elongation 2.8% 2.5% Similar
Hardness 57 HB 78 HB 3004 is harder

Bend Radius Comparison

Recommended Minimum Bend Radius (90-degree Cold Forming), Reference Test Method - ASTM E290, Thickness (t)

3003 Aluminum Alloy Bend Radius

Temper 1.6mm 3.2mm 4.8mm 6.0mm 10mm
O 0t 0t 0.5t 1t 1t
H12 0t 0.5t 1t 1t 1.5t
H14 0.5t 1t 1t 1.5t 2.5t
H16 1t 1.5t 2.5t 3t 4t
H18 2.5t 3t 4t 5t 5.5t

3004 Aluminum Alloy Bend Radius

Temper 1.6mm 3.2mm 4.8mm 6.0mm 10mm
O 0t 0.5t 1t 1t 1t
H32 0.5t 1t 1t 1.5t 1.5t
H34 1t 1.5t 1.5t 2.5t 2.5t
H36 1.5t 2.5t 3t 3.5t 4t
H38 2.5t 3t 4t 5t 5.5t

The listed bend radii are the minimum recommended values for bending the sheet without cracking. The application method is based on standard press brake cold forming using an air-bend die. Alternative types of bending operations may require larger or smaller radii. Tooling quality and design can affect radius outcomes.

3003 vs 3004: How to Choose

Choose 3003 Aluminum Alloy when:

  • You need complex forming (deep drawing, tight bends).
  • Cost optimization is a priority.
  • Manufacturing consumer goods (refrigerators, cookware, fan blades).
  • Producing signage, lighting, and architectural trim.
  • General sheet metal fabrication.
  • Thermal conductivity is required for heat exchangers.
  • Making chemical equipment (storage tanks, piping).

Choose 3004 Aluminum Alloy when:

  • Beverage can manufacturing (can bodies).
  • Architectural roofing systems (Al-Mg-Mn panels).
  • Making pressure vessels and chemical storage tanks.
  • Automotive applications (fuel tanks, body panels).
  • High strength is needed in thin gauges.
  • Used in coastal and marine environments.
  • Fabricating traffic signs and road signs.
  • Welded assemblies require maximum joint strength.

3003 vs 3004: How to Choose

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the difference between 3003 and 3004?

These two general-purpose alloys are very similar. In terms of chemical composition, 3004 aluminum alloy has added magnesium, which gives this grade an advantage in strength.

Is 3003 aluminum used for cookware?

Yes, 3003 aluminum alloy is widely used in cookware manufacturing due to its excellent formability, good thermal conductivity, and food-safe properties.

What is 3004 aluminum used for?

3004 is primarily used for beverage can bodies, architectural roofing systems, pressure vessels, automotive fuel tanks, and structural applications requiring high strength.

What is the difference between 3003 and 3004?

3004 has added magnesium, making it stronger (by about 50%), while 3003 has better formability and thermal conductivity.

Conclusion

Both 3003 and 3004 aluminum alloys are exceptional materials—but they are optimized for different tasks. Each alloy performs outstandingly in its intended applications. The key is to match the material properties to your specific needs. Consulting with a materials engineer or a qualified supplier can help ensure the optimal alloy is selected for your project.

Let's Start a Conversation

Whether you need a quote, technical support, or customized solutions, our team is ready to assist.

  • Product specifications & technical consultation
  • Free samples & fast quotation
  • Flexible payment terms & trade assurance
  • Custom packaging & logistics solutions
Reach Us Directly: Office Address:
Room 3611, Block A, Yonghe Longzihu Plaza, Zhengdong New District, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

Send Us an Enquiry

Fill in the form below and we'll get back to you within 24 hours.

Wechat QR code